| 1. |
How long has this program been operational? |
|
|
|
4 years |
|
|
| 2. |
What are the
major purposes of this program? What problem(s) or issue(s) was
it designed to address? |
|
|
| |
The major purpose is to save lives of Oregon coastal
residents and visitors. The problem
is the rapid arrival of
devastating tsunami waves from Cascadia off-shore
earthquakes. |
|
|
| 3. |
Describe the
specific activities and operations of the
program. |
|
|
| |
- A school curriculum, including video, has been
designed for tsunami education programs
for grades
K-12
- Educational Podiums have been placed on frequently
visited beaches along the Oregon
coast to explain
the tsunami hazard and provide instructions
regarding evacuation when
required.
- Brochures and other materials are provided as
information pieces and as takeaway
educational
items for visitors to coastal hotels and motels.
|
|
|
| 4. |
Does this
program take a new and creative approach or
method? If yes, please describe. |
|
|
| |
Yes. Most of the program was designed in Oregon and is
currently being adopted or
considered for adoption in other Pacific states. Further, the components of this program
could well serve as a model for educational efforts for other perils affecting a
state or
geographical area. |
|
|
| 5. |
What were
the program’s start-up costs and source(s) of
funding? |
|
|
| |
$50,000
Budget Source: State of Oregon, NOAA, FEMA,
USGS, as well as private funds from Native
American
commercial activities |
|
|
| |
What are the programs annual operational costs and
source(s) of funding? |
|
|
| |
$80,000 Budget Source: State of Oregon, federal and
private funds |
|
|
| 6. |
How many
employees (full-time equivalent) work(ed) with
this program?
|
|
|
|
.65 FTE |
|
|
| 7. |
To the best
of your knowledge, did this program originate
in your state?
|
|
|
|
Yes |
|
|
|
Are you aware of similar programs in other states? |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
|
| 8. |
Has the
program been fully implemented? |
|
|
|
No |
|
|
|
If No, what actions remain to be taken? |
|
|
| |
Podium placement on the beaches is being done
community by community as funds become
available.
Curriculum implementation in the schools is a continuing
effort. |
|
|
| 9. |
Is there
evidence that the program has been effective in
achieving its stated purpose(s)? Briefly summarize
evaluations (pro and con) of how well the program has
addressed the defined problem(s) or issue(s). |
|
|
| |
There has been public polling that shows an increase in
awareness of the tsunami
hazard---especially in the
schools. |
|
|
| 10. |
How has the
program changed since its inception? What
limitations or obstacles might other states expect to
encounter if they attempt to adopt this program? |
|
|
| |
The pace has accelerated and new products are added as
it has expanded, especially to
other states. Work is
constantly required to help people appreciate the
magnitude of the
potential hazard. |
| |
|
| 11. |
Additional
Comments |
|
|
|
There are two points that I would like to bring to the
attention of the awards
committee: |
|
|
|
The evaluation of this project, while not unique, has been
effective and has been
produced in language that can be
understood by political entities, the general public,
teachers and the school children of the state. It is
straightforward and clear. |
|
|
|
Ms. Karel and her colleagues have been most generous in
sharing their program concepts,
design and implementation
practices with others. Further, they have hosted visits
from
around the country for people who might benefit from
seeing their work "in
action". Other parts of the nation may
not be exposed to the tsunami hazard; however,
valuable
lessons have been learned in Oregon about how to
develop programs that will be
used and that will result in a
more informed, and thus safer, populace. |