| 1. |
How long has this program been operational?
|
| |
|
| |
First meeting: September 1994. |
| |
|
| 2. |
What are the major purposes of this program? What problem(s) or
issue(s) was it designed to address?
|
| |
|
| |
This is a five county partnership of Area Agencies on Aging (AAA)
and Centers for Independent Living (CIL) to assure that Seniors and People with
disabilities are prepared for major emergencies. Major disasters in the Bay Area have
shown
that Seniors and People with disabilities are not prepared and have little or no
access to appropriate preparedness resources. |
| |
|
| 3. |
Describe the specific activities and operations of the program. |
| |
|
| |
- Build coalitions and facilitate group
meetings where agencies collaborate
on disaster planning for Seniors and people with disabilities.
- Promote and implement regional standards
- Outreach and training to groups working with Seniors and People with
disabilities
- Facilitate conversations to put preparedness on the agenda of
agencies providing support and service to Seniors and People with disabilities.
|
| |
|
| 4. |
Does this program take a
new and creative approach or method? If yes, please describe. |
| |
|
| |
This Coalition brings together diverse agencies to address a very
specific
common concern. Through the coalition, participating agencies find solutions,
which work within their individual budget and resource limitations. The
collaborative
process and the group involvement allows participating agencies
to learn from each other
and share resources. |
| |
|
| 5. |
What were the program’s
start-up costs and source(s) of
funding? |
| |
|
| |
$ 59,000 Budget Source: Northern California Disaster Preparedness
Network |
| |
|
| |
What are the programs annual operational costs and source(s)
of funding? |
| |
|
| |
$45,000 minimum Budget Source: Foundations, PG&E, United Way,
Local AAA |
| |
|
| 6. |
How many employees
(full-time equivalent) work(ed) with this
program? 1 FTE |
| |
|
| 7. |
To the best of your
knowledge, did this program originate in your state? Yes |
| |
|
| |
Are you aware of similar programs in other states? No |
| |
|
| 8. |
Has the program been
fully implemented? |
| |
|
| |
If No, what actions remain to be taken? |
| |
|
| |
The Coalition wants to broaden their network and scope of
operations. |
| |
|
| 9. |
Is there evidence that
the program has been effective in achieving its stated purpose(s)? Briefly summarize evaluations (pro and con) of how well
the
program has addressed the defined problem(s) or issue(s). |
| |
|
| |
The Bay Area Emergency Preparedness Coalition for Seniors and People
with Disabilities has been extraordinarily effective in helping agencies address the
preparedness concerns of their constituents. Participating agencies have developed
disaster plans and consider preparedness information to be a
needed and valuable service
to offer their clients, for whom they are the
primary service providers. The Coalition is
credited with helping to
institutionalize preparedness for agencies providing service to
vulnerable populations in the Bay Area. |
| |
|
| 10. |
How has the program
changed since its inception? What limitations or
obstacles might other states expect to encounter if they attempt to
adopt this program? |
| |
|
| |
The biggest change is the recent loss of the program manager. The
greatest limitation has been having only one FTE who must also generate program
funding.
Actively pursuing funds takes time, with no guarantee of return on the hours invested.
Without secured funding the staff must often choose between doing the training, and
programmatic development or pursuing operation funds. |
| |
|
| |
The same problem arises when hiring staff for this type of project.
The skill set required for meeting facilitation, training and program development are
often
quite different from those required for successful grant writing and income
generation. |
| |
|
| 11. |
Additional comments: |
| |
|
| |
The Bay Area Emergency Preparedness Coalition for Seniors and People
with Disabilities is an excellent example of the power of commitment and clarity of
purpose. The Coalition staff and volunteer leadership provide such focus,
clarity and
support, that participating agencies are able to rise above their differences, resource
limitations and other obstacles to achieve their goals.
This is a model for a sustainable,
community initiative that produces
measurable results and gives added value to the
participants. |